Eks

Disaster events are one of the biggest challenges that a software organization can face. Natural disasters like earthquakes or floods, technical failures such as power or network loss, and human actions such as unauthorized attacks can disable an entire fleet of systems, leading to complete failure for a business. To deal with disaster scenarios requires a proactive approach to prepare and recover from failure. One of the key benefits of running in the cloud is how easy it is to run workloads in multiple regions. This allows you to deploy a resilient architecture that supports disaster recovery, even in the cases where an entire region is disabled. ...

AWS provides four different storage options for your Kubernetes cluster: EBS, EFS, FSx for Lustre, and Amazon File Cache. Each of these CSI drivers has different performance characteristics, depending on your workload. This post quantifies those performance differences using the flexible I/O tester FIO. Note: For an overview of the different CSI options available on AWS, see Picking the right AWS CSI driver for your Kubernetes application. Before we start, please note that these results come with multiple caveats, and you should absolutely test performance on your own workloads before making any final decisions. For example, a workload with many random reads is typically latency sensitive and would benefit from higher IOPS, whereas a workload consisting of mostly streaming reads is typically throughput sensitive and would benefit from higher bandwidth and at large I/O sizes with relatively lower IOPS. ...

Dealing with storage is a core challenge when running complex applications on Kubernetes. While many applications operate just fine using a cloud database or blob storage, some applications have performance or design requirements requiring local storage. Note: For performance benchmarks see [Benchmarking AWS CSI Drivers](<{{ relref “/post/kubernetes/benchmarking-aws-csi-drivers” }}). When this is the case, developers and cluster operators rely on Container Storage Interface (CSI) implementations to provide local storage for Pods. When running on the AWS cloud, no less than four CSI providers are available for us to use: Elastic Block Storage, Elastic File System, FSx for Lustre, and AWS File Cache. This article compares these four different local storage options to help you choose the right option for your application. ...